Okay, I remembered today why I never read the comments portion of articles. I read the one about Mayim Bialik and her divorce. I try not to read celeb fodder, but I'd seen her talking about AP on a show awhile back. Yep, I remember her from Blossom, and more recently she made news by publicizing her book about her version of attachment parenting. She cosleeps, doesn't spank, breastfeeds, baby wears, and also does elimination communication. Of course the cause of her divorce is all of this crazy parenting, husband can't handle it, they never get to have naughty time, blah, blah, blah, eye roll, vomit. The comments were endless, obviously all the commenters were marriage counselors, child development specialists, and the like. Or not. After I was finished with my tirade of angry blows at uneducated opinions and the people behind them, and a random rant to my unsuspecting husband, I figured out what I was angry about. And you know, it's the same thing that made me furious during the elections. Labels. They were attacking the label "attachment parent" without even knowing what it meant, very obviously not knowing what it meant. Very clearly not understanding that AP does not mean exactly the same for all of us and that we all adapt it to what works for us. For our family, breastfeeding and cosleeping is a necessity! We have older boys and I need a rested mama and baby to keep things running. I hate yelling, both the sound and the general feeling when a person is that angry, so we try not to do that. I am trying to understand how that is weird. In my book, it's called loving your kids, I don't have to label it with a certain philosophy or method. Love your kids. Do the best by your kids. If it feels wrong, don't do it. And really, let's stop with labels. Boy things, girl things, AP's, black, gay, gahhhh, make it stop. Let's just call it what it is, we love our kids, we choose not to hurt them, we choose to feed them in the most natural way possible (when and where they need to eat), we let them sleep near us to feel secure, we feed them in the night when they are hungry, we respond to their cries/needs/concerns. But guess what else, I tend to my needs too, I take a time out for myself when I feel like I am about the lose my $hit, I also go to nursing school because I have personal goals as well. I even invest time in my marriage because it's important for me (and the hubs to) to feel loved and cared for. So yes, it's possible to be a balanced human and live by attachment parenting principles. In the end, we will still be labeled, and judged, and really who cares, it reminds me not to judge, to be tolerant, and gentle parent on...because the haters clearly weren't breastfed anyway, ZING!
Visit the hippie club at https://www.facebook.com/ZippyHippieMama
I'm so glad I did not and have no seen this article. Of all the reasons for divorce, attachment parenting is now being included? Seriously. Mayim Bialik is very intelligent (has her PhD in neuroscience) and I completely respect her for AP.
ReplyDeleteI am also dismayed that so many 'specialists' are joining the bandwagon against AP. I am a child development specialist (part of my teaching license and degrees) and whole heartedly endorse, condone and PRACTICE parts AP. A person should do what is right for their child, themselves and their family.
You are not ranting or raving. You are making more mommas aware of what's going on and I applaud you for it.
Found you, following :-)
DeleteYou are always so kind!!! It just upset me because even within the AP community, we may not all make the same choices, we just do our best and that's all we have to give. None of us are perfect, but to assume that was the cause for her divorce and that her husband was an unwilling participant is disgusting and hurtful. Just wondering, do you have a blog, you have so much knowledge, you'd do so great!
ReplyDelete